As you know, Gentle Reader, I have an ongoing quest to find an alternative to the Wexis Course Management Software options of TWEN and Web Course. (This ongoing quest is not to be confused with my ongoing quest to find a decent bagel in Central Kentucky or my ongoing quest to find a pair of high heels that I can walk in or even my ongoing quest to get a decent haircut. But I digress…) Another contender has been released today – Wiggio.

This was designed for intra-student collaboration, but it has just about all the basics of a course management system – calendars, document sharing, polls, emails (and text and voice messages), etc. There is no message board, but there is a feature very similar to the “Facebook Wall and Newsfeed” that shows all the action taken on the site as well as allows for participants to post notes. Also from what I can tell, the sites are private and only open to registered participants….but I can’t see if there’s a way I can limit who joins the groups. That may be a problem.

Here’s some screen shots:

Above is the front page to the group with the newsfeed/wall combo.

Calendar feature

Document sharing.

Conduct a poll.

Sending a message. Note that you have the option of sending an e-mail, text message or voice message. In the “meeting” option, which I don’t have a screen shot of, you can pick conference call or chat room, which appear to be on the site itself.

And,finally, a place to post relevant links.

If not a course management system, librarians may find wiggio useful in organizing committee work or other project planning.

As part of the blog post that pointed me towards wiggio, it mentioned Popego as another “collaboration company”. I got all the way through the registration process before I realized that it’s basically another aggregation of services site like MeeId. There are some differences, but that’s basically what it is. Here’s mine.

In the course of trying to find that Webware blog post so that I could write this blog post, it appears that google apps has an educational suite that allows educational institutions to outsource much of their IT to google for a discounted rate. At my level, by which I mean I have no say in any upper level IT decisions on my campus, this knowledge does nothing for me. But I thought someone may be interested, so I thought I’d share.


Mindmapping Web 2.0

I’m doing a presentation on “Web 2.0 in Law Libraries” at the 2008 ORALL Annual Meeting. Yeah, that’s the title. Exciting, I know. I deliberately left my presentation title and program description vague because given the rapid change of technologies, I wasn’t sure what would be relevant in October when I proposed this program in April.

Now that it’s September….I still don’t know exactly what I’m going to say or do. But a combination of a good night’s sleep, thinking about my survey idea all week, and an extra big cup of coffee this morning made me a little creative and I started brainstorming.

If I lived in a perfect world, an entire wall of both my home and work office would be covered with a white board where I could hash these things out. Alas, I do not live in a perfect world. So, for me anyway, the next best thing was utilizing one of the many free mindmapping applications available on the web. I used mindomo, mainly because it was one of the first hits when I googled “mind mapping on the web”, and I can’t say I have any complaints thus far about it.

Here’s what my Web 2.0 in Law Libraries Map looks like. I’m still a long way from getting this presentation done, but I feel a little more sane when I think about it. And, as an added bonus, since it’s on the web and not on a piece of paper, the chances of me losing it go down considerably. However, it’s only saved on the Mindomo server, a company that I have given no money to and could disappear overnight. (One of my constant “checks in the negative column” for Web 2.0 companies.) So maybe I’ll print out a copy just to be safe….

survey idea update number one

Okay, this post is basically an adaptation of the e-mail I sent my director and Head of Public Services telling them my idea about the survey.  It’s somewhat repetitious from yesterday’s post, but I think I explain my rationale and thoughts about the survey a little better than I did yesterday.  And the updates are included, which are:

  1. A print survey is probably more scientifically accurate
  2. Print surveys cost money for postage, paper, bubble sheets, etc.  However, there are research grants available
  3. I looked in to the IRB human test subjects issue, and anonymous surveys don’t have to go through quite as many hoops
  4. I’m going to want to take a good hard look at my survey instrument and then check it again
  5. There’s a whole lot of statistics that I need to remember.


Basically, as you know, I am really interested in Web 2.0 technologies and their application to the law library environment. However, in conversations with my students and just seeing first hand their tech skills, I’m starting to wonder if anyone besides librarians and tech geeks are using things like RSS feeds, Twitter, blogs, etc.  I checked, and there’s no hard data out there about uses and wants of law students and Web 2.0.   So I thought a survey was in order.

So, first I thought I’d survey my classes.  Then I expanded my idea and thought I’d survey all the LR classes.   Then it grew bigger, and I thought I’d do all of UK Law.  Then I just thought, well heck, I should just try to survey as many law students as I can.  I’ve discussed the idea with some of my Web 2.0 mentors and pals and have received strong encouragement that this is a good idea and much needed information for the legal community.

My first thought was to do a web survey.   However, in talking about it today with some people and giving it some thought, that may be a self-selecting thing if it’s on the web.  So I’m thinking about a paper survey for greater scientific accuracy.  I know enough people who know enough people that I could probably get it distributed pretty widely.  Of course, this means money is involved for postage, printing of questions and buying bubble sheets, but oh happy day, my correspondents have also pointed out that there’s AALL research grants available.

So, right now my plan is to start simultaneously work on getting the research instrument tightened up, doing the paperwork for the Institutional Research Board human test subjects (this project is exempt because it’s an anonymous survey, but I still have to fill out a 7 page form saying so), figuring out a budget for paper, bubble sheets, postage, etc and writing for grants.


Am I wasting my life?

A confluence of circumstances and events has got me to thinking lately about what I do, how I do it, all that good stuff. A summary (and you can almost just skip this part really because it’s just about borderline navel gazing. I put a graph at the end that summarizes the summary) :

  • Due to a “greening initiative” and tight budgets, my law school has gone as paperless as is humanly possible. The greatest effect I’ve felt from this decision is that I spent many hours this month training faculty and faculty assistants on TWEN. It was a very eye opening experience, to say the least. Now, I don’t expect everyone to have advanced computer skills, but I was shocked to find that in this day and age, there are people amazed that you can drag and drop files around folders in your computer.
  • Classes started and I’m teaching four sections of legal research this fall. During some pre-class discussions, I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of my students were trying Google Chrome and were actually discussing it’s pluses and minuses. On the other hand, the intricacies of TWEN seem too much for some of them to handle. Sure they can do Facebook, but so what?
  • When discussing Twitter with my boss, she wanted to know if I thought anyone would use it if we set up a library account. And for that matter, is anyone reading our library blog? To which I intelligently responded, “Uhhhh…..maybe?” (Hey, I had just got done teaching three of my four sections – I was fried!) Also this week my brother and sister (non-library civilians) both joined Twitter. Aside from them, most everyone I “talk to” on Twitter is a librarian or in the tech industry. Same thing with my blog contacts, facebook friends, etc. I have no idea about the uses of these services by “normal people.”
  • I’ve been starting to keep track of “Vendor 2.0” initiatives, such as the the ones implemented by HeinOnline. Librarians are geeking out about them, but is anyone else?
  • I just completed my dossier for my university’s promotion and tenure process, so I’ve gotten to take a good hard look at everything I’ve done over the past year. And I’m starting to see some intriguing job ads. So I’m starting to think about where I want to go next, what I need to do to get there, have I just wasted the past year, what projects should I spend my energy on next year, etc.

Anyway, in case that was confusing, I made a graph. I make lots of graphs. [/Lisa Simpson]

survey graph

So, it occurred to me that one way to clear up some of this confusion in my life was to find some hard data about what law students use and want when it comes to technology. I initially thought that I’d ask my sections of LR informally, and then I thought I’d ask the LR other sections at UK, and then I thought, “Well, heck, why don’t I just ask every law student I can get my hands on around the country?”

So I created a survey.

That is just a first, very very rough draft. Please don’t share it with law students just yet. But, Gentle Reader, if you have any suggestions, I would be more than willing to hear them – content, applications I’m missing, typos – whatever ya got. I’m not sure about any future plans for the data other than I just need some questions answered for my own sanity. If I get decent enough results I may try and write an academic paper or get a presentation out of it. If not, I’ll definitely make the info available here and to anyone who asks. Library science is about sharing, yo.

As for the technical aspects of that survey, I used the forms feature on Google Docs and I have it embedded in a Google Sites page. Advantages of this:

  1. Free cost
  2. If I’m reading things right, up to 5000 responses (although I would wet myself if I got that many responses)
  3. Easy to create and use
  4. Google sites URL looks cleaner than the survey monkey or zoombafoo (or whatever it is) one.


  1. I can’t seem to keep my questions from migrating around the page. The help group suggested that I edit in IE, which I grudgingly did, but that didn’t seem to help. I may try re-writing the whole thing in IE.

Okay. Again, I just came up with this idea four hours ago, so it’s still really rough. But I’m definitely open to any constructive criticism you may have. Also, if you know of someone else who may have this type of data set, let me know. I did a quick and dirty check of law journal articles, but found nothing.

I’m hoping to get this revised and tech aspects done with so I can start virally spreading it around the country mid-October. So, drop a comment here or e-mail me if you have any suggestions. Thanks.


Hi, my name is Sarah and I’m a Web 2.0 addict.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how to organize my various profiles on Web 2.0 sites. This weekend I’m going to play around and see if I can create some sort of electronic dossier. Until I figure out exactly how I want to do that, an out of the box option that I just found today is MeeID. I’m using it to organize my profiles, but they offer other suggestions on how to use it.

Here’s what mine looks like or you can visit it here.

One problem found thus far: it won’t let me have enough characters to use my full name, so I had to stick with “S. Glassmeyer.” Ah, well, I don’t need my full name everywhere on the Internet.